Ex parte Mitsuye Endo, 323 U.S. 283 (1944), was a United States Supreme Court ex parte decision handed down on December 18, 1944, in which the Court unanimously ruled that the U.S. …

It appears that Miss Endo desires to return to Sacramento, California, from which Public Proclamations Nos. 7 and 11, as well as Civilian Exclusion Order No. 52, still exclude her.

Ex Parte Endo (1944) 1944 In December 1944, the Supreme Court authorized the end of Japanese American incarceration by ruling that "concededly loyal" U.S. citizens could not be held, regardless of …

Jan 5, 2024 · In the case of In re Mitsuye Endo 323 U.S. 283 (1944), announced in December 1944, the United States Supreme Court held unanimously that the federal government could not confine …

…decision, in its ruling on Ex parte Endo, the Supreme Court skirted the constitutionality of internment as a policy but determined that the government could not detain a U.S. citizen whose loyalty was …

Thus the case became identified as "Ex parte Endo" — ex parte being a legal way of saying that the case came from one side only (most appeals to higher courts have two sides, the appellant's and the …

Mitsuye Endo was represented by James C. Purcell, an attorney who visited the Tanforan Assembly Center (an internment camp on the West Coast) after agreeing to represent a number of Japanese …

Mitsuye Endo, an American citizen, was evacuated by military order from Sacramento in 1942 and ultimately held in the Central Utah Relocation Center in Topaz, Utah. She filed a petition of habeas …

United States (1944), the justices upheld orders removing Americans of Japanese origin to detention camps. That decision was softened--but only slightly--by Ex parte Endo (1944), handed down the …

It appears that Miss Endo desires to return to Sacramento, California, from which Public Proclama-tions Nos. 7 and 11, as well as Civilian Exclusion Order No. 52, still exclude her.